Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding of nursing home residents is not associated with improved body composition parameters

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

To study differences in nutritional status and body composition, by feeding modality, among disabled nursing home residents.

Design

A retrospective chart-review study.

Setting

A nursing wing of a public urban geriatric center.

Participants

Three groups of patients: non-dysphagic, orally-fed dysphagic and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy -fed dysphagic patients. Intervention: Standard nursing care

Measurements

Basal metabolic rate, total energy expenditure and nitrogen balance under oral or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. Dietary intake was assessed during a 3-days period by daily-food intake protocols and a 24-hours urinary creatinine excretion to detect nitrogen balance and calculate body composition parameters.

Results

Data of 117 patients (55.5% females), mean age 84.6±7.5 (range 66–98 years) was analyzed. Dysphagic patients (60) differed from non-dysphagic patients (57) by lower body mass index (p=0.020), fat mass index (p=0.017), daily protein intake (p<0.0001), daily energy intake (p<0.001), protein related energy intake (p<0.001) and a negative nitrogen balance (p<0.001). In regression analyses, dysphagia was associated with increased risk of having a body mass index lower than 22.0kg/m2 (OR=2.60, 95% CI 1.135–5.943), a negative nitrogen balance (OR=2.33, 95% CI 1.063–4.669), a low fat mass index (OR=2.53, 95% CI 1.066–6.007), and low daily protein and energy intakes per body weight (OR=2.87, 95% CI 1.316–6.268 and OR=2.99, 95% CI 1.297–6.880). Compared with orally-fed dysphagic patients (21pts.), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy -fed patients (39pts.) received an additional mean energy intake of 30.5% kcal per day and mean protein intake of 26.0%. This additional intake was not associated with improved body composition parameters (such as fat free mass, skeletal mass or body mass index).

Conclusion

Dysphagic nursing home residents are characterized by worse nutritional, metabolic and body composition parameters, compared with non-dysphagic residents. Body composition parameters did not differ between orally-fed and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-fed dysphagic patients, despite significantly better nutritional and metabolic parameters in PEG-fed patients. Other approaches (perhaps physical training, pharmacological etc.) should be sought to improve body composition of such patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kayser-Jones J, Pengilly K. Dysphagia among nursing home residents. Geriatr Nurs 1999; 20:77–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Loughlin G, Shanley C. Swallowing problems in the nursing home: A novel training response. Dysphagia 1998; 13:172–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Wuttge-Hannig A, Ortega P. Social and physiological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia 2002; 17:139–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martineau J, Bauer JD, Isenring E, Cohen S. Malnutrition determined by the patientgenerated subjective global assessment is associated with poor outcomes in acute stroke patients. Clin Nutr 2005; 24:1073–1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Volkert D, Berner YN, Berry E, Cederholm T, Coti Bertrand P, Milne A et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: Geriatrics. Clin Nutr 2006; 25:330–360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leibovitz A, Baumoehl Y, Lubart E, Yaina A, Platinovitz N, Segal R. Dehydration among long-term care elderly patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gerontology 2007; 53:179–183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marik PE, Kaplan D. Aspiration pneumonia and dysphagia in the elderly. Chest 2003; 124: 328–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cabre M, Serra-Prat M, Palomera E, Almirall J, Pallares R, Clavé P. Prevalence and prognostic implications of dysphagia in elderly patients with pneumonia. Age Ageing 2009; 39:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rand WM, Pellett PL, Young PR. Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults. Amer J Clin Nutr 2003; 77:109–127.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Millward DJ. Sufficient protein for our elders? Amer J Clin Nutr 2008; 88:1187–1188.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolfe RR, Miller SL, Miller KB. Optimal protein intake in the elderly. Clin Nutr 2008; 27: 675–684.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolf-Klein GP, Silverstone FA, Lansey SC, Tesi D, Ciampaglia C, O’Donnell M, et al. Energy requirements in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Nutrition 1995; 11:264–268.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Poehlman ET, Dvorak RV. Energy expenditure, energy intake, and weight loss in Alzheimer disease. Amer J Clin Nutr 2000; 71:650S–655S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eastwood C, Davies GJ, Gardiner FK, Dettmar PW. Energy intakes of institutionalized and free-living older people. J Nutr Health Aging 2002; 6:91–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alix E, Berrut G, Boré M, Bouthier-Quintard F, Buia JM, Chlala A et al. Energy requirements in hospitalized elderly people. J Amer Geriatr Soc 2007; 55:1085–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman C, Ricevuto A, DeLegge MH. Enteral nutrition in patients with dementia and stroke. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010; 26:156–159. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-7-22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaikh AK, Hamilton EL, Bharadwaj P, Ward K. Revising the use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in patients with advanced dementia. Palliat Care Res Treat 2009; 3:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aita K, Takahashi M, Miyata H, Kai I, Finucane TE. Physicians’ attitudes about artificial feeding in older patients with severe cognitive impairment in Japan: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 2007; 7:22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Roy J, Kabumoto G, Mor V. Clinical and organizational factors associated with feeding tube use among nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment. J Amer Med Assoc 2003; 290: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clarfield AM, Monette J, Bergman H, Monett M, Ben-Israel Y, Caine Y, et al. Enteral feeding in end-stage dementia: a comparison of religious, ethnics and national differences in Canada and Israel. J Gerontol 2006; 61A: 621–627.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wirth R, Bauer JM, Willschrei HP, Volkert D, Sieber CC. Prevalence of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in nursing home residents. A nationwide survey in Germany. Gerontology 2010; 56; 371–377.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaul E, Singer P, Carderon-Margalit R. Tube feeding in the demented elderly with severe disabilities. Isr Med Assoc J 2006; 8:870–874.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Löser C, Aschl G, Hébuterne X, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Muscaritoli M, Niv Y et al. ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition — Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Clin Nutr 2005; 24:848–8461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Candy B, Sampson EL, Jones L. Enteral tube feeding in older people with advanced dementia: findings from a Cochrane systematic review. Int J Palliat Nurs 2009; 15:396–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Forbes GB, Bruining GJ. Urinary creatinine excretion and lean body mass. Amer J Clin Nutr 1976; 29:1359–1366.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Heymsfield SB, Arteaga C, McManus C, Smith J, Moffitt S. Measurement of muscle mass in humans: validity of the 24-hour urinary creatinine method. Amer J Clin Nutr 1983; 37:478–494.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McArdle W, Katch F, Katch V. 1996. Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition, and Human Performance, 4th edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, p.850.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:127–132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Berner YN, Stern F, Polyak Z, Dror Y. Dietary intake analysis in institutionalized elderly: a focus on nutrient density. J Nutr Health Aging 2002; 6:237–242.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rofes L, Arreola V, Almiral A. Diagnosis and management of oropharyngeal dysphagia and its nutritional and respiratory complications in the elderly. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2011;818979. doi: 10.1155/2011/818979.

  31. Milward DJ, Fereday A, Gibson N, Pacy PJ. Aging protein requirements and protein turnover. Amer J Clin Nutr 1997; 66:774–786.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fukagawa NK, Young VR. Protein and amino acid metabolism and requirements in older persons. Clin Geriatr Med 1987; 3:329–341.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McCann R. Lack of evidence about tube feeding — food for thought. J Amer Med Assoc 1999; 1282: 1380–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Friedel DM, Ozick LA. Re-thinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(23):1756.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gaillard C, Alix E, Boirie Y, Berrut G, Ritz P. Are elderly hospitalized patients getting enough protein? J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56:1045–1049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kimyagarov S, Klid R, Levenkrohn S, Fleissig Y, Kopel B, Arad M, et al. Body mass index, body composition and mortality of nursing home elderly residents. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010; 51:227–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Landi F, Liperoti R, Fusco D, Mastropaolo S, Quattrociocchi D, Proia A et al. Sarcopenia and mortality among older nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012; 13:121–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wijnhoven HA, Snijder MB, van Bokhorst de van der Schueren MA, Deeg DJ, Visser M. Region-specific fat mass and muscle mass and mortality in communitydwelling older men and women. Gerontology 2012; 58:32–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jespersen J, Kjaer M, Schjerling P. The possible role of myostatin in skeletal muscle atrophy and cachexia. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006; 16:74–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yarasheski KE, Bhasin S, Sinha-Hikim I, Pak-Loduca J, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF. Serum myostatin-immunoreactive protein is increased in 60–92 year old women and men with muscle wasting. J Nutr Health Aging 2002; 6:343–348.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The “Gilad” Geriatric Center, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel

    S. Kimyagarov, D. Turgeman, Y. Fleissig, R. Klid, B. Kopel & Abraham Adunsky

Authors
  1. S. Kimyagarov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Turgeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Fleissig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Klid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. Kopel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Abraham Adunsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abraham Adunsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kimyagarov, S., Turgeman, D., Fleissig, Y. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding of nursing home residents is not associated with improved body composition parameters. J Nutr Health Aging 17, 162–165 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-012-0075-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-012-0075-3

Key words

Search

Navigation